A couple of days ago, I visited a creative-writing class at Montana State University Billings, invited by an instructor who is kind of enough to have me come up once a semester to meet with her students.
The instructor, Sue Hart (so complete a repository of knowledge about literature of the West that she ought to be a national treasure), told me that this class, in particular, was lively and engaged on the topic of writing.
She wasn't kidding. In a rollicking 90 minutes, we covered a huge range of subjects related to writing and publishing. Of those, two stood out as particularly salient in this time when those who aim for traditional publishing are facing intense competition and those who lean toward independent publishing confront a huge marketing challenge.
To protect the innocent, I'll identify the question and not the questioner:
Since a publisher provides editors, how much do I have to worry about grammar and punctuation?
An honest question deserves an honest answer: You should worry about it greatly. In fact, if you don't worry about it, your chances of having an agent or a publisher or an editor are heavily compromised.
Now, this doesn't mean that you need to be conversant in the dative case or be able to fling cognate objects around. Generally speaking, the good, solid grounding in grammar that most of us received in the middle school years will serve you well. If that level of proficiency eludes you but you're still interested in writing, get help. Freelance editors stand by, ready to assist you in elevating the quality of your manuscript. A writing group, particularly one with some editorial-minded members, can be of great assistance.
The bottom line: If you're writing with the expectation that you'll submit the material for publication, you need to have grammar and punctuation locked down.
I'm reluctant to turn my work over to an editor because I worry about the lack of control. What can I do?
The good news: Self-publishing has never been easier, so if you want to lone-wolf it, go right ahead.
The bad news: Your work is likely to languish among the hundreds of thousands of other half-baked self-published titles, and all the while you're promulgating the biggest stigma on self-publishing: that it universally sucks. Those who most assuredly don't suck and in fact are making a tidy business out of it will not be particularly pleased with you.
The landscape is changing quickly. Established writers, ones who have successfully placed books with traditional publishers and built readerships, are in many cases migrating to independent publishing. If you want to compete, you'd better be damned good.
It's simple, really: Good editing is a vital piece of the publication process. If you have the do-it-yourself spirit, go forth and prosper.
But be warned: You have a better chance with an editor in your corner.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Craig Lancaster's first novel, 600 Hours of Edward, was a 2009 Montana Honor Book and is a finalist for a 2010 High Plains Book Award. His second, The Summer Son, will be released in January 2011 by AmazonEncore. He's also the owner and editor of Missouri Breaks Press, a boutique literary press in Billings, Mont., and offers editing, typesetting and design assistance. Learn more about him and his services at CraigLancaster.net.
Interesting views you have on self-publishing, which seams to be on of the hottest things right now. I agree on the grammar thing. It doesn't make a good first impression if you submit a manuscript full of errors >:)
ReplyDeleteCold As Heaven
Very helpful advice, Craig. I hope new writers find it helpful. Of course seasoned writers need to have their work edited, too.
ReplyDeleteVery good points, Craig. And I agree with Maryann - we can all use a second set of eyes to read over our work!
ReplyDeleteGood advice. Some think that self-publishing means you don't have to be perfect and readers will understand that you didn't have the help of an editor at a big publishing house. In reality, what readers will understand is that they will not waste their money on your next book and they'll hesitate to buy any other self-pubbed book.
ReplyDeleteCraig, you are so right. Sometimes we don't even know what we don't know until we have an editor review our work. When my editor's comments came back on my beautiful first mystery for which I had received a contract and therefore I thought was in great shape, I was shocked. I'm so grateful I went with a traditional publisher that provided in-house editing.
ReplyDeletePatricia
Craig, you are so right. Sometimes we don't even know what we don't know until we have an editor review our work. When my editor's comments came back on my beautiful first mystery for which I had received a contract and therefore I thought was in great shape, I was shocked. I'm so grateful I went with a traditional publisher that provided in-house editing.
ReplyDeletePatricia
There really isn't a lone wolf method unless you want to crash and burn. Even the best, most experienced writers use editors, often several, and proof-readers, which is a different matter entirely.
ReplyDeleteEven though I'm very good with grammar and punctuation, I know my writing needs an objective second eye, an eye that will be brutally honest. Like Patricia, I was shocked too when my contracted novel came back the first time from my editor. If I should ever self-publish, I will definitely fine an editor who will give me good, honest feedback.
ReplyDeleteAnn
Craig - any chance you could be our Dry Humor Guy? LOL. You need to do at least one funny post per month.
ReplyDeleteDani
I agree. A good editor in the corner is essential. That's why I chose Helen Ginger to edit Killer Career.
ReplyDeleteMorgan Mandel
http://morganmandel.blogspot.com
http://myfearlist.blogspot.com
Godd advice, Craig. Without an editor or two my written cookie would certainly crumble. And fast.
ReplyDeleteThank you.